Fate of the World

When discussing the possibility or necessity of world unification, one is constantly reminded of the aphorism that each and every human being on the planet has an opinion, and that these opinions are often irreconcilable with each other. Those among us of the multicultural persuasion would have us all believe that these differences are necessary for the preservation of ethnic, cultural, and religious diversity. It is forwarded that we must “tolerate” differences so that we don't lose an essential nugget of our humanity. However, with difference of opinion comes its symbiote conflict, whether the spur to it be religious, political, racial, economic, or what have you.

The continuance of human conflict is your nemesis in Fate of the World, the efforts of Red Redemption studios expanding their flash title Climate Challenge, produced for the BBC's science and nature channel. This title has some very good points to make about the world at large, as well as some truly baffling quandaries to present. Prepare yourself for confusion sprinkled with a thimbleful of enlightenment.

Driving the gears of Fate of the World is a vast collection of data derived from the work of Dr. Myles Allen, who previously worked for the United Nations Environment Program in Kenya, and whose research has produced some of the condemning evidence linking human activity to the slow, gradual, warming of our atmosphere. Said data is used to simulate a projection of how continuing to pollute will affect the life of the entire planet, and there is a LOT of data. Statistics representing every facet of human existence are available, and from this miasma you are supposed to produce a balance capable of satisfying seven billion-, no, eight bil-, no ni-, well, an ever-increasing population.

In various scenarios as the head of a globe-spanning humanitarian organization, you'll be tasked with cleaning up the planet in various fashions; A daunting task to say the least. Every five years of simulated time, you play cards representing policies and projects from several categories: political, social, environmental, scientific, and energy-related, as well as long-term sustainability challenges. Goals will vary by scenario, but in general you want to reduce pollution, increase the human development index, discover new ways of combating temperature increase and make the world more stable. Across dozens of turns, the situation will constantly shift, requiring new tactics each iteration. When the global temperature rises, storms will begin to plough through Asian forests, firestorms will begin to ravage crops in Africa, endangered species will likely die out, and the populace will begin to distrust your action or inaction depending on their outlook. A more observant and knowledgeable person than I would be able to see the impending collapse of the world economy and to prepare for it, but I was unable to, and this was the primary source of frustration during my efforts.

On that note, the difficulty of the various challenges on offer are very intentionally curved to closely match their real-world counterparts, so that you have to juggle economy, environment, food supply, energy supply, political stability and more while attempting to please anybody and everybody's regional complaints. To do so, do you allow certain regions to languish while focusing on the prosperity of a select few? Do you allow yourself risky measures such as draconian government for the increased efficiency of production and research? Do you attempt to convert all of humanity into a giant tree-hugging vegetarian commune and lose the benefit of a large economy? The eventual realization that there are no loopholes in this system adds to the consternation. As a statement on reality, this is unequivocal in its challenge: “Do you want the world to be better?” the game asks. “Well, if so, you'd better knuckle up, concentrate, and make some tough choices.”

I claim no expertise on world affairs, and the environment in particular, but the predictions that Dr. Allen's data makes are unsettlingly haunting, a tone that matches the visual and auditory elements. World's soundtrack consists primarily of variations on a single theme that reflect regional styles. The tune itself gets tedious after a few hours, but the changes help keep it from grating too hard. The presentation of devastating world events through a simulated TV news broadcast is cold and uncaring in exactly the way that actual newscasters recounting disasters are. This once again raises the question of how far it is possible to stretch humanity without becoming numbed to the hardships of our fellows.

While certainly not as satisfying as more traditional card strategy games, Fate leaves a conviction that the challenges it presents are surmountable. Even though the scenarios are difficult, it is at least possible to get a little bit into each before you begin to fail. Thus, progress is almost certain, and any factors you overlooked in a previous attempt you're more likely to notice the next time. It certainly is engaging, but unfortunately carries a great deal of frustration alongside. Fate of the World illicits strong reactions that ultimately culminate in either frustration and abandonment or perseverance and triumph. What you take away will largely depend on your patience and commitment to success. Can you lead humanity to the zenith of existence? Can you defeat society at its own game? Prepare your policies and step up to the podium to accept responsibility if you dare.